Thursday, February 17, 2011

Response to Eamon's post.

So in one of my favorite books of all time The Book Thief the main character and all her friends die. Yet for some reason this didn't bother me. Maybe that's because something I hate more then anything else, is when a book that's not in a series ends with "So and So walked into the sunset, never turning back." For me that is so frustrating. Making up an ending in your mind isn't as satisfying as having an author write one. 

A death at the end of a book finalizes it, concludes it nicely. What if Harry Potter had ended with both Voldemort and Harry alive? What if Lord of the Rings had ended with the ring undestroyed? While these endings were both happy, I would have been Equally satisfied if Harry died, but not Voldemort.

There's nothing worse for me than closing a book, looking up, and having to think So, what happened then?  Sad endings usually have more of a finish to them. When we reread happy endings the question of the ending always nags us. When we reread sad endings the question is answered again in full.

Friday, February 11, 2011

VERY IMPORANT

Excuse me! IMPORTANT!  If you are going to comment on ma blog, please go two posts down. This is a post I want to discuss.

Thanks a bunch,
Retep Rellid.

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Ooogah!; For nice writing look at the post before this please.

Three days ago, a famous children’s book author, Brian Jacques passed away at age 71. I own seventeen of his twenty one books, all part of the Redwall series. These books captivated my imagination till sixth grade. The series all pivot around one standard plot. The good guys are various woodland creatures, namely mice, otters, squirrels, moles, shrews, hares, badgers and hedgehogs. The bad guys are always Hawks, toads, foxes, rats, weasels, ferrets, and stoats.  While the books do run similar, they are wonderfully written. He originally wrote them for blind children, so he uses a lot of description.
One thing that always bothered me however, is how the bad guys have not a scrap of goodness in them. They betray their friends, kill each other and ravage the country side. They have not one good asset to them. Maybe this is just to lay out good and evil simply for children. Or maybe it’s his way of justifying the good beats killing them but still.
i don’t know one human being that is so unforgivably evil. Not one. People aren’t black and white. They’re not good and evil. They’re more like shades of grey. They have good sides, and terrible sides. The stoats and foxes should have some pitiable sides. You should be able to see them care for their pups and babies. It can be flipped too. The good guys have no bad side. They are pure in their absolute kindness. There is no so-so character.
This is, of course, me reading it from an adult view. I still appreciate for a great work of writing and a beautiful children’s book. But every time I encounter an evil character I wince. Because I know that everyone has both a good side and a bad side, and that should be acknowledged in the book. 

Followers